🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where African descendants are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since that time, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A campaign to scrub African American heritage and experience from the archives is under way. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the celebration represents how little it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand actions for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is basic knowledge of the bygone era when it ignores the current situation of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that face all if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Contemporary Black History Month.